Showing posts with label Conscientious objection. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Conscientious objection. Show all posts

Thursday, April 2, 2015

Rant Warning - Consciencious Objection - Yay or Nay?

Okay, I know I may be preaching to the choir here, but here is my question of the day. When did we get to the point where we are no longer allowed to conscientiously object to participate? I have been spending way too much time "debating" the whole Indiana "Religious Restoration Act" in Indiana on Twitter. Yes, I "twitter", so sue me.

But, honestly, when did we reach the point where tax-paying American citizens are no longer able to object to participate just because they do not want to? Just because one opens a private business that happens to be on a publicly-funded thoroughfare, why do we lose our right to not to participate in any event for which our religious convictions preclude our participation?

Now, I do not personally object to same-sex marriage, I am not particularly religious, and do not own a private business, but...and that is a big BUT (and by big, I mean Kardashian-butt "big")! Maybe it is bacause I live in a multi-culti city with many kosher businesses, but I just don't understand. Specifically, I know the risk to the neighborhood kosher businesses if I should decide to enter a kosher business with any non-kosher products against posted warnings. They would have to shut down, scrub the place clean, and be re-certified as "kosher" by an annointed Rabbi, so I respect their kosher laws so they can avoid the issue (and selfishly, because if they had to close I would not be able to partake of their delicious, old-fashioned, hand-rolled bagels...).

Why is it not the same for business owners who believe that they cannot participate in same-sex marriage events whether by baking a cake, providing a venue, or taking photographs? Do I agree? No, I do not necessarily. But do I respect their right to not particpate? YES! And I do not agree that businesses that decline to participate in events for which they conscientiously object and who are specifically targeted should be force to participate by threats of lawsuits and violent intimidation.

What do you think?
[+] Read More...

Thursday, March 19, 2015

"No Shirts, No Shoes, No Service" Issues

I have a simple question to discuss. Do you think that private business owners have the right to deny service to someone that they "conscientiously object" to giving service to?

Yes, I know the history of denying Black citizens the right to eat at a lunch counter was a flashpoint in the civil right movement. But should a private business owner like a bakery or a florist be compelled by law to provide their service to a same-sex marriage when it does not comport their personal religious belief?

I have had a day-long discussion on the Dailybeast.com with several people on this subject and, maybe I am just a bit too libertarian on this subject, but I truly believe that small private business owners should have some rights to refuse service to anyone for whatever reason that they deem objectionable. Do I think that it makes for "good business" practice...absolutely not. But do I think that they should have the right to do it? Absolutely, yes, I do. Private business owners should have the right to decide. I call it the "No shirts, No shoes, No service" rule. Maybe I am wrong, but what do you think.

Let's discuss.

Disclaimer: No people of Irish descent were harmed in the making of this post...
[+] Read More...