I am not sure what any of you think about James O'Keefe and Project Veritas, but here are some undercover videos they have released in the last weeks on some disturbing issues regarding voter fraud and campaign shenanigans that border if not directly cross into fraud. Of course, the Clinton campaign and the media have taken "the high road" and have ignored them. It was revealed today O'Keefe has been temporarily banned from Twitter. The good news is that some well-placed people in the videos who revealed too much have been fired for revealing too much but that's not enough.
The first video features the NYC Board of Election Dem Commissioner Alan Schulkin. After the release, there has been a call to have him dumped for basically telling the unguarded truth in my humble opinion. During our recent April primary, it was discovered that at least 100,000 legitimate registered voters had been struck from the voter rolls for no apparent reason. And our NYC Board of Elections is famous for losing ballots (conveniently), lengthy recounts, and other shenanigans that would and should raise the eyebrows of the DOJ if it was happening south of the Mason/Dixon line, yet has not.
The following are a series of three undercover videos released from Oct. 17-Oct 24 on exposing some fairly disturbing direct coordination between the Clinton campaign and political action committees (PACs) that are supposed to be completely independant. Because I am lazy, I have just cut-n-pasted the descriptions of each directly from Project Veritas. Enjoy!?
Of course, none of this should be surprising, yet it will be ignored because Trump has not been in any of them saying something stupid or incendiary.
FYI, I have jury duty this week and most likely won't be able to respond until later tonight.
The first video features the NYC Board of Election Dem Commissioner Alan Schulkin. After the release, there has been a call to have him dumped for basically telling the unguarded truth in my humble opinion. During our recent April primary, it was discovered that at least 100,000 legitimate registered voters had been struck from the voter rolls for no apparent reason. And our NYC Board of Elections is famous for losing ballots (conveniently), lengthy recounts, and other shenanigans that would and should raise the eyebrows of the DOJ if it was happening south of the Mason/Dixon line, yet has not.
In the video, NYC Democratic Commissioner of the Board of Elections Alan Schulkin is caught on hidden camera at a United Federation of Teachers holiday party admitting that there is widespread voter fraud in New York City.
The following are a series of three undercover videos released from Oct. 17-Oct 24 on exposing some fairly disturbing direct coordination between the Clinton campaign and political action committees (PACs) that are supposed to be completely independant. Because I am lazy, I have just cut-n-pasted the descriptions of each directly from Project Veritas. Enjoy!?
In this explosive new video from Project Veritas Action, a Democratic dirty tricks operative unwittingly provides a dark money trail to the DNC and Clinton campaign. The video documents violence at Trump rallies that is traced to the Clinton campaign and the DNC through a process called birddogging.
A shady coordinated communications chain between the DNC, Clinton Campaign, Hillary Clinton’s Super PAC (Priorities) and other organizations are revealed. A key Clinton operative is on camera saying, “It doesn’t matter what the friggin’ legal and ethics people say, we need to win this motherf**ker."
In the second video of James O'Keefe's new explosive series on the DNC and Hillary Clinton campaign, Democratic party operatives tell us how to successfully commit voter fraud on a massive scale. Scott Foval, who has since been fired, admits that the Democrats have been rigging elections for fifty years.
Part III of the undercover Project Veritas Action investigation dives further into the back room dealings of Democratic politics. It exposes prohibited communications between Hillary Clinton’s campaign, the DNC and the non-profit organization Americans United for Change. And, it’s all disguised as a duck. In this video, several Project Veritas Action undercover journalists catch Democracy Partners founder directly implicating Hillary Clinton in FEC violations. “In the end, it was the candidate, Hillary Clinton, the future president of the United States, who wanted ducks on the ground,” says Creamer in one of several exchanges. “So, by God, we would get ducks on the ground.” It is made clear that high-level DNC operative Creamer realized that this direct coordination between Democracy Partners and the campaign would be damning when he said: “Don’t repeat that to anybody.”
Of course, none of this should be surprising, yet it will be ignored because Trump has not been in any of them saying something stupid or incendiary.
FYI, I have jury duty this week and most likely won't be able to respond until later tonight.
15 comments:
You gotta love the "we fired some people over this but there's nothing to see here" approach. Interestingly, I keep seeing O'Keefe referred to as a felon which, if I'm not mistaken, is false. To the best of my ability to verify, he was once charged with a felony but plead a misdemeanor in the case. The sloppiness is stunning. Correct me if I'm wrong.
It"s the as the PP videos. "We have never sold baby part and promise never to do it again. And correct, O' Keefe was charged with a misdemeanor and the prosecutors were censured for molicious prosecution...I think.
Its O'Keefe so I'm sure there are misleading edits and statements but ignoring his part the videos are sometimes appalling (the voter fraud stuff) and often boring (activists working hand in hand with politicians, one side trying to bait the other into doing something stupid...).
People ignoring (or playing up) a video of a guy bragging about criminal conduct because it does or doesn't suit their purpose? Must be a day that ends in 'y'.
It"s the as the PP videos. "We have never sold baby part and promise never to do it again. And correct, O' Keefe was charged with a misdemeanor and the prosecutors were censured for molicious prosecution...I think.
Anthony, this isn't just people accepting or ignoring things based on their agenda. Obviously, that always happens. This is Watergate stuff and a very real, black-and-white test to see whether the laws of this country apply equally regardless of political affiliation. This is less about November 8 and more about the next four years. Practice saying the phrase "President Kaine" just in case.
Vote guilty, Bev! ;)
The thing is...
Wikileaks has revealed that the Clinton pretty much hold their followers in contempt. They lie to them, call them stupid, and plan to go against their wishes. Yet, the same people who should be horrified don't give a damn.
The left does not care about right or wrong. They are anti-right, that is all they are. They would support a child rapist, a nun-killer, or even a smoker if it got them power.
And with the right having abandoned journalism and the culture machine (and apparently winning office), none of this matters. The right has given the left a free pass to act any way they want.
It's sad, but true.
"...even a smoker"??? Surely not??? That is just waaaaaaay beyond the pale!!!!
Vote guilty, Bev! ;) Hmmmm, i prolly shouldn't respond to this, right?8-D
Anthony, if O'Keefe is "edited" for content and misrepresentation, then that indictment extends to every single piece of video evidence available including the news media. If it were true, Project Veritas would have been indicted on fraud a long time ago or at least had themselves sued out of existance. They also show just how easy it is to get people to speak candidly. If only they could do this with will seasoned politicians, though as we have seen with Wikileaks, they put enough in emails.
Btw, I am not sure what we lose by them not being "transparent". That is a farce of a concept anyway. We hear/see/taste/smell/feel what politicians want us to. The Dems and Clinton are not upset that Assange hacked; they are upset that Assange hacked them and are exposing them drip by drip.
Anyway, back to the central booking...er...jury room.
Tryanmax - I agree. And I also believe that if Clinton wins and the Repubs keep Congress, impeachment hearings will start almost immediately.
Tryanmax,
This is accepting or ignoring things based on the politics of the guilty. There is no just, it's a huge problem. It's how we ended up with with the choices we have and why things may get worse down the line.
Bev,
Yes that indictment extends to the media. It partly explains why both candidates are largely immune to media damage (the other part is both have been public figures for decades and their problems don't shock anyone).
Well, jury service was fun. Got picked for a panel in a litigation that I am heavily involved in. We all had a good laugh and I was released. It was kind of disappointing because I really like serving on juries. You get to see that the system of trial by jury really does work well.
I'm so jealous. I've never even been called up. I'll probably never get to serve on a jury because I'm too eager.
Post a Comment